![]() ![]() The program itslef is in a half baked state, and I am not sure it even understands the whole range of todays X server traffic but at least I've managed to succesfully use the package by redirecting the output to file or running vie another machine. In fact every time when the output of xscope itself is running over a terminal on the same server. Indeed the lockup you describe happens here too. > - probably it is just wrong usage - any hints welcome -) > is necessary to kill xscope by logging in via ssh. > - but gedit doesn't start up completly, X server + xscope + gedit hangs, it > - xscope displays some X11 protocol communication > - started "DISPLAY=:1 gedit" in another console > - running it on the same machine as the X server did not work well: > - I would reformat the last sentence in the %description section to use up the If its not really an acceptable BSD like license then so be it. I've only looked cursory on the licence because frankly licenses make me queasy. > confirm I've asked on the fedora-legal list for confirmation. > 100% sure its a real BSD license since the wording is different. > - Although the meaning of the license seems to match the BSD license, I'm not > - clarification about the license (I've sent a mail to fedora-legal.) > I've reviewed the package and it looks quite good. probably it is just wrong usage - any hints welcome -) but gedit doesn't start up completly, X server + xscope + gedit hangs, it is necessary to kill xscope by logging in via ssh. xscope displays some X11 protocol communication started "DISPLAY=:1 gedit" in another console running it on the same machine as the X server did not work well: * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) * shared/static libs, pkgconfig/header/*.la files: OK (n/a) parallel build supported via _smp_mflags package builds correctly in koji for F12 and F11, but failed for F10 upstream status of the patch is obviousįce6e9df7881061013f4acd43742585b xscope-1.1-diff_to_git.patch patch file can be regenerated by the supplied git diff command I would reformat the last sentence in the %description section to use up the available space of 80 charaters.Ĭ37ec177b56d5909584c1672b6beabd5 xscope-1.1.tar. * specfile in American English and legible: OK Just to confirm I've asked on the fedora-legal list for confirmation. Although the meaning of the license seems to match the BSD license, I'm not 100% sure its a real BSD license since the wording is different. Rpmlint SPECS/xscope.spec RPMS/i586/xscope-* SRPMS/11.src.rpmģ packages and 1 specfiles checked 0 errors, 0 warnings. if possible it would be great if the package would compile in F10, too. clarification about the license (I've sent a mail to fedora-legal.) I've reviewed the package and it looks quite good. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |